What exactly are these “camera Ray-Bans / Meta Smart
Glasses”
These are smart eyewear products from Ray-Ban in
collaboration with Meta (Facebook), combining traditional sunglasses/glasses
frames + built-in camera + audio + “smart” features (voice command, AI, app
integration, etc.). There have been a few generations:
- Ray-Ban Stories / “Gen 1” Meta / earlier models – these were the initial versions of the smart glasses that came with more basic specifications and features.
- Ray-Ban Meta (Gen 2) – this is the latest version, released in mid to late 2025, featuring improvements in battery life, camera quality/video, and software functionalities.
Tech Spec Highlights (Gen 2 vs Gen 1 / Stories)
Here are some of the detailed specs and what’s new in Gen-2.
This is based on what Meta and reviewers have published. Gadget 360
|
Feature |
Gen 1 / “Stories” / Meta earlier |
Gen 2 Meta (2025) |
What this means in practice |
|
Camera resolution / video capture |
~5 MP on older “Stories” versions; video at 1080p smaller
clips. Laptop Mag |
12 MP ultrawide, 3K Ultra HD video capture (30 fps)
for up to ~3 minutes in high res; also supports 1440p at 30fps, 1200p at
60fps. Reference Here |
Much sharper footage in daylight; better for content
creators or people who want good POV videos. But image sensor size still
limits low-light performance. |
|
Battery life (glasses alone) |
Earlier: around 4-6 hours in moderate/light use;
considerably less if capturing lots of video, audio streaming, etc. Android Central |
Gen 2 claims up to 8 hours for “typical use.” Gadgets 360 |
Better endurance, possibly good for a full daytime outing.
But heavy video / livestreaming still drains battery quicker. |
|
Charging / case |
Old versions had a case that provides extra charges
(Stories case gives ~3 full charges) and charges via USB-C. trustedreviews.com |
Gen 2 has quicker charging: 50% in ~20 minutes; also the
charging case gives more “on-go” backup (some sources say ~48 hours extra via
the case) about.fb.com |
Means more “buffer” when you’re out; less anxiety if
battery gets low. The case becomes more important. |
|
Audio / Microphones / Other features |
Earlier models had speakers built into the arms, mic
arrays; voice activation etc. Tech Advisor |
Gen 2 improved mics (better noise reduction), more
powerful open-ear speakers; AI features (voice assistant, “Hey Meta”), live
translation, new “conversation focus” to enhance voice clarity in noisy
environments. about.fb.com |
Better usability in more situations (e.g. hearing someone
in a crowd), better/more natural audio capture. But still limited by hardware
(speaker quality, ambient noise). |
|
Storage |
~32 GB in many recent models (for photos, videos) in
earlier Meta smart glasses. Android Police |
Likely similar or same in Gen 2; main difference is video
resolution fills storage faster. Android Central |
If you record high res video a lot, storage becomes a
bottleneck; you’ll need to regularly transfer or clear. |
|
Durability / Other limitations |
Older versions had limitations: moderate resistance to
moisture (not waterproof), low light performance, battery drop in heavy use,
etc. Guiding Tech |
Some improvements in battery/camera; but many of same
limitations persist (low light, sensor size, limited video duration at
highest quality, etc.). Also concerns about weight, comfort, maybe price. Guiding Tech |
Real-World Use: What Users & Reviews Say
From reviews, user reports, etc., here are how these glasses
perform under everyday conditions. This helps you see trade-offs beyond spec
sheets. Guiding Tech
What works well
- Daylight
/ bright outdoors: Photos and video look good, sharp, well saturated.
Perspective is nice since it's point-of-view (POV).
- Casual
video & social content: Perfect for quick short clips, stories,
“on the go” shots without pulling out phone. Filters / vertical formats
are built in / optimized.
- Hands-free
convenience: Taking a photo with a voice command or a button is faster
/ more spontaneous than unpacking phone.
- Audio
for calls or voice assistant works fairly well; plenty of
functionality especially in quieter environments.
What disappoints / trade-offs
- Low-light
performance is weak: noise/grain, poorer image quality indoors or in
dim light. Stabilization less effective in such conditions. Guiding Tech
- Battery
life drops with heavy use: recording video + audio + livestream +
voice assistant uses a lot more battery, sometimes significantly less than
the “typical” claim. Many users report needing to bring the case / charge
mid-day. Android Central
- Video
duration limits: At highest resolutions or high frame rates, video
clips are limited in length (e.g. ~3 minutes in some modes for Gen 2). Gadgets 360
- Comfort
/ aesthetics / weight: While designed to look like “normal”
sunglasses, adding the electronics makes them bulkier/heavier than
standard Ray-Bans. Some people find them less comfortable for long wear.
- Price
vs performance: Given what a good phone camera or action camera can
do, some feel the smart glasses are more of a convenience / novelty
product rather than equal or better in all respects. If you care about
purely best image quality, there are better options.
- Privacy
/ social concerns: The presence of a camera so close to the eyes
raises issues (others may feel uncomfortable). Also must consider data /
privacy settings. The Verge
Recent Improvements in Gen 2 & What’s New
Gen-2 (2025) brings meaningful updates that address several
of the complaints people had with earlier versions. Gadgets 360
- Much
better battery: up to ~8 hours in normal use, which is nearly double
for many scenarios compared to earlier. Quick-charge helps.
- Higher
video quality: 3K Ultra HD at good frame rates; better ultrawide HDR
capture.
- Improved
microphone / audio clarity: better noise filtering, better voice
capture, more “useful” voice assistant / translation / conversation focus
features.
- More
frame / style options: Wayfarer, Skyler, Headliner, more color
choices. So you get variety.
- Better
charging case backup: more extended “on-the-go” battery via the case.
Pricing & Availability; What to Watch Out For
Here are what people should know about costs, availability,
and “real cost” issues. Some of this is region-specific. Rappler
- The US
launch price for Gen-2 starts at US$379. Gadgets 360
- Earlier
there was an announced price in the Philippines of ₱29,990, but
that was later clarified not yet official / in error — the
distributor stated that the product is not yet officially available in PH
at that price. Rappler
- Because
import duties, shipping, retailer markup etc., the PH price (once it’s
official) will likely be higher than the US equivalent.
- Additional
costs to consider: accessories (charging case replacement), lens types
(sun lens, prescription, etc.), possibly warranty / servicing.
- Also,
given newer releases, older Gen-1 or “Stories” versions might be
discounted — if you don’t need the top specs, a cheaper older unit may
still satisfy you.
For Whom Are They “Worth It”? / Decision Guide
To help you decide, here are some situations where buying
the Meta Ray-Ban (Gen-2) makes more sense, and where maybe not.
|
Scenario |
Likely Worth It |
Possibly Not Worth It |
|
You often capture spontaneous moments, travel, vlogs,
events without wanting to pull out a phone |
✔️ Convenient; POV video is
compelling. |
If you already always carry a phone with excellent camera,
the incremental benefit might be small. |
|
You’re a content creator / active on social media, want
vertical format, frequent sharing |
✔️ Good video resolution,
style, speed. |
If your content requires extremely high quality (pro
low-light, high dynamic range), you may still prefer dedicated camera gear. |
|
You care about stylish look + tech combo |
✔️ Ray-Ban frames + Meta tech
have appeal. |
If you just want tech and don’t care about fashion, there
might be cheaper / more functional alternatives. |
|
You use in bright conditions / outdoors mostly |
✔️ Daylight performance is
strong. |
If most of your usage is indoors, at night, dim light —
performance will be weaker. |
|
Budget is flexible enough to absorb premium price +
imported cost |
✔️ If you’re fine paying top
price for convenience, you’ll get value. |
If you’re price sensitive, you may regret paying for
“brand + novelty” rather than raw performance. |
Final Verdict: Is It “Worth It Now”?
Putting everything together, here’s my current view (as
of late 2025):
- For
people who value convenience, style, and being able to capture POV
content without a phone, the Gen-2 smart glasses are a good,
increasingly strong option. The improvements in battery life and video
resolution make them more usable in real life than earlier versions.
- They’re
no longer just “gimmicks” — many of the earlier major limitations have
been addressed enough that they feel like viable gadgets for creative use,
travel, and casual everyday use.
- But:
they’re still not perfect replacements for high-end cameras, nor
for a flagship phone in many respects (especially low light, dynamic
range, audio fidelity, extended video). If those are priorities for you,
you might want to compare what you could get at a similar price with a
phone or small action cam.
- Also,
the extra cost (relative to alternatives) and issues like import /
warranty / repairing, plus the novelty factor, means you should think
carefully before you pay full price. If you can wait or watch for deals or
local availability, that might result in a better value.
0 Comments